![]() I've used overall small sizes since that was meant more for demonstrating ( demonstration purposes) how to do such a frame, also what I've shown in the above template examples is kept small in size. I show you here quickly via a screencast video, why those got curves (vectors). Yes one is " Curves" ( vectors), as I used two rectangles a bigger and a smaller one, selected and geometrical subtracted these, in order to get the outer thinner black filled frame. Here's my confusion: each of those 3 layers is (to me) some sort of a vector object. How can I crop it out precisely? Isn't there some way to 'snap' the Crop to the contents of a layer? The frame is the dimensions I want, the photo is in it, but it's inside a larger document. Sure I can drag the crop rectangle around and get pretty close to the exact edge of that frame, but what a pain. I want to crop the image to just the frame - in other words, 'snap' the crop to the Frame I've created. But that frame is now within a larger "Canvas" which shows a white background. So I resize the canvas to be larger than that "Frame", and now I can resize it to the size and aspect ratio I want. But when I drop a photo on it and try to adjust it I see that it actually has a pixel size, 1600 x 1200. Though you should maybe make yourself a horizontal/vertical ( portrait & landscape format) template, or if you make just one, then copy and rotate that one 90° over as needed by your images.Īnd it works, mostly. Afterwards you can always reuse that one and adapt it optically (it's colorings etc.) so it meets different for your individual shots frame/mat colors. You just need to make/setup one time a reusable Frame/Mat template for yourself, the sizes and way you would like that initially to look like. What I've shown you above as a template, is entirely created out of just rectangle shapes (with the addition of a little bit added FX shadow for the mat rectangle part). Using layer effects (fx inner/outer shadows).Take a look into the APh 2 Online help to get an idea what these things offer and how to make use of them. all have/share internally a geometrical rectangle form. ![]() Well as a photographer you should at least know what a rectangle shape is, as your cams viewer, display and sensor etc. Further I'm not sure if StudioLink would be a possible memory hog for/on older not that performant systems.I don't know what a Rectangle or a Style "is", or what I can do with them ![]() Find/replace (?), well that's usually what I call a mandatory function for every app which claims to deal/work with probably lot of texts. and so on.) I would personally have more a need for. Honestly, APub doesn't yet in its early state offer most of the functionality (book/manual projects, seperate chapter file handling, indexing over several files, cross-references, sidenotes/footnotes, equation math handling, SGML/XML, ePub, HTML. ![]() That sounds somehow like the OP then is right with his marketing wise assumptions. As well as some enhanced macro capabilities, as Carl mentioned. And it also gets you Find/Replace for text, improvements to Frame Text, and some other functions that are useful in Designer and that may remain Publisher exclusives. Yes, you need to license Publisher to get StudioLink, but it's well worth the money, in my opinion, even if you do nothing else with Publisher but use it to improve the integration of Designer and Photo. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |